واکاوی پویایی‌های قدرت در خانواده: یک نمونه مطالعه‌ی کیفی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه روانشناسی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران

10.22034/aftj.2023.366583.1801

چکیده

هدف: هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی مولفه­های قدرت در خانواده است. روش پژوهش: این مطالعه با روش کیفی و به روش تحلیل مضمون انجام شد. روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند از نوع متجانس بود به این ترتیب که 12 نفر از زنان و مردان متاهل اعم از راضی و ناراضی از زندگی زناشویی بود که براساس ملاک­های ورود و خروج انتخاب شدند و مورد مصاحبه قرار گرفتند. ابزار پژوهش مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته بود. داده­های گردآوری شده به کمک تحلیل مضمون مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته­ها: نتایج شش مقوله اصلی را نشان داد که عبارت بودند از 1) منابع قدرت (قانونی، فردی، زوجی، خانوادگی) 2) توزیع قدرت (براساس توامندی‌های فردی، منابع قدرت بیرونی، جنسیت و سن) 3) راهبردهای دستیابی به قدرت (راهبردهای سازگار و ناسازگار) 4) آسیب شناسی قدرت (نبود سلسله مراتب قدرت، تنظیم قدرت بر اساس منابع بیرونی و عجز یک یا هر دو زوج در تنظیم قدرت) 5) هدف از قدرت یابی (فردیت طلبی، زوجیت طلبی و آرمان جویی خانوادگی) 6) آثار قدرت در خانواده (آثار منفی و آثار مثبت). نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به این نتایج می­توان گفت قدرت در خانواده سازه­ای چند بعدی و پویا است که آسیب­های آن می­تواند خانواده را به آشفتگی سوق دهد و بالعکس

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Examining the power dynamics in the family: a sample of qualitative study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Vahid Soltanian 1
  • Zahra Yousefi 2
  • Felor Khayatan 2
1 PhD student, Department of Psychology, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Aim: The aim of the present study is to examine the components of power in the family. Method: This study was conducted with a qualitative method and a theme analysis method (Clark & Brauan, 2006). The purposeful sampling method was homogeneous in this way that 12 married people, both men and women, were satisfied and dissatisfied with married life, who were selected based on the entry and exit criteria and were interviewed. The research tool was semi-structured interview. The collected data were analyzed with the help of thematic analysis. Results: The results showed six main categories, which were 1) sources of power (legal, individual, couple, family) 2) distribution of power (based on individual capabilities, external power sources, gender and age) 3) strategies for achieving power (compatible and incompatible strategies) 4) pathology of power (lack of power hierarchy, regulation of power based on external sources and inability of one or both couples to regulate power) 5) goal of gaining power (individualism, matrimonialism and family idealism) 6) Effects of power in the family (negative effects and positive effects). Conclusion: According to these results, it can be said that power in the family is a multi-dimensional and dynamic structure whose damages can lead the family to chaos and vice versa

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • power
  • family
  • theme analysis
Bashirgonbadi, S., Dargahi, S., Ahmadbokani, S., & Fadakar, P. (2021). Testing causal model of marital satisfaction based on attachment styles with the mediating role of triangulation. Health and hygiene in Ardabil, 12(1), 12-29. [In Persian]
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 11(4), 589-597.‏
Feizi Iraj, & Madahi, J. (2022). Power structure in the family and divorce; examining the moderating role of gender attitudes. Iranian Social Issues, 13(1), 87-107. [In Persian]
Ferguson, K. T., & Evans, G. W. (2019). Social ecological theory: Family systems and family psychology in bioecological and bioecocultural perspective. In B. H. Fiese, M. Celano, K. Deater-Deckard, E. N. Jouriles, & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Foundations, methods, and contemporary issues across the lifespan (pp. 143–161). American Psychological Association.
 Fiese, B. H., Celano, M. E., Deater-Deckard, K. E., Jouriles, E. N., & Whisman, M. A. (2019). APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Foundations, methods, and contemporary issues across the lifespan, Vol. 1 (pp. xxvi-815). American Psychological Association.‏
Fisher CA, Skocic S, Rutherford KA, Hetrick SE. )2019). Family therapy approaches for anorexia nervosa. Cochrane Database System Rev. 1;5(5):CD004780.
FitzPatrick, B. (2019). Validity in qualitative health education research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning11(2), 211-217.‏
Gerson, M. J. (2019). Psychodynamic theories of the family. In B. H. Fiese, M. Celano, K. Deater-Deckard, E. N. Jouriles, & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Foundations, methods, and contemporary issues across the lifespan (pp. 21–35). American Psychological Association.
Jackson, J. B., & Landers, A. L. (2020). Structural and Strategic Approaches. The Handbook of Systemic Family Therapy1, 339-364.‏
Khodabakhshi Koolaee. A., Shaghelani Lor, H., Soleimani, A. A., Rahmatizadeh, M. (2014). Comparison between family power structure and the quality of parent-child interaction among the delinquent and non-delinquent adolescents. Int J High Risk Behav Addict, 8;3(2):e13188..
Lebow, J. L. (2019). Current issues in the practice of integrative couple and family therapy. Family process58(3), 610-628.‏
Li, Z. (2022). Family Decision Making Power and Women’s Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 1-16.‏
Mahdavi, M. S., & Sabouri Khosroshahi, H. (2003). Investigating the power distribution structure in the family. Women's Social and Psychological Studies, 2(42), 27-68. [In Persian]
Meler, T. (2020). Money, power, and inequality within marriage among Palestinian families in Israel. The Sociological Review, 68(3), 623-640.
Mirzaei, H., Aghayari H., & Katbi, M. (2015). Investigating the power distribution structure in families in Tabriz city. Social Sciences of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 12(1), 69-91. [In Persian]
Moradi, H., & Yousefi, Z. (2017). Predicting the executive performance of elementary school girls based on family systemic characteristics (triangulation and boundaries) and father's participation. Journal of Preschool and Elementary School Studies, 2(8), 93-110. [In Persian]
Rajali, H., & Yousefi, Z. (2021). Predicting marital relationship based on intelligence and thought control strategies and the moderating role of family relationship dimensions and triangulation in married women. Applied Family Therapy, 2(1), 126-142. [In Persian]
Szapocznik, J., & Hervis, O. E. (2020). Brief strategic family therapy. American Psychological Association.‏
Winnicott, D. W. (2012). The family and individual development. Routledge.
Yi, C. C., Lu, Y. H., & Pan, Y. K. (2017, November). Women’s family status: A comparison of the family power structure in Taiwan and China. In Walking a Tightrope: Meeting the Challenges of Work and Family (pp. 91-116). Routledge.
Zipp, J. F., Prohaska, A., & Bemiller, M. (2004). Wives, husbands, and hidden power in marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 25(7), 923-948.